An independent project ·Why this exists ·How this is made ·Research
Asheville · Western North Carolina
Step Up AVL
How to Think About Homelessness · Asheville, NC

Who, and How Many

Almost every argument about homelessness is really two questions in one. One is about why a particular person ended up on the street. The other is about why a particular town has as many people without homes as it does. They have different answers, and we keep giving the first answer to the second question.

THE ASSUMPTION

Picture the person you've actually seen: the man talking to no one on Patton Avenue, the woman with everything she owns in a cart by the library. Whatever you assumed about addiction or mental illness, you may well have been right. Those struggles are real.

That assumption explains, maybe, why that man is the one outside. It does not explain why Asheville and Buncombe County counted 824 people as homeless on a single night in February 2026.

Personal troubles can explain who ends up without a home. They cannot explain how many.

THE FRAME Two questions, not one

Pull the two apart and most of the confusion falls away. The evidence for one is not evidence for the other.

The first question is about a person. Why did this man, this woman, end up on the street? Here the real answer is a life story, and it's rarely simple: a job that ended, an eviction, a relationship that fell apart, a diagnosis, an addiction, a kid who aged out of foster care with no one to call, a partner whose fists made home more dangerous than the street. Any of these can tip one person over an edge the rest of us are also standing near.

The second question is about a place. Why does Buncombe County have hundreds of people without homes, while some other county the same size has far less? The life stories cannot answer that, because you find roughly the same ones everywhere. Addiction lives in every county in America. So does mental illness, and bad luck, and heartbreak. They all show up in places with almost no homelessness.

If addiction and mental illness were what set the number, the places with the most addiction and mental illness would have the most homelessness. They do not. Something else is setting the number, and the life stories only tell you who.

THE MODEL A game of musical chairs

The easiest way to see the difference is an old comparison, written down by the sociologist Kay Young McChesney in 1990.

Imagine the game: ten players, nine chairs, the music playing. When it stops, someone is left standing. It will probably be the slowest player, or the one on crutches, or the one who got distracted. Watch only that round, and if it's the one on crutches, you'd blame the crutches.

But the crutches did not take the chair away. Take a chair away and someone is left standing every single time, no matter how fit and fast and sober every player is. Add a chair back and everyone sits down, including the player on crutches.

The game does two things at once. It tells you that the gap between players and chairs determines the number of people left standing. And it tells you that people's own troubles, like the crutches, decide only which players are left out, never how many.

The players are the households with the lowest incomes. The chairs are the homes priced within their reach. When there are more players than chairs, some pay more than they can afford and others double up with friends or family. Anyone still without a place after that is left out when the music stops. Addiction and illness and bad luck determine who. The shortage of chairs determines how many.

100 households. 38 homes.

The chairs, counted

For every 100 of North Carolina's lowest-income renter households, the number of rental homes that are both affordable to them and actually available.

An affordable, available home (38) A household with no affordable, available home (62)

Source: National Low Income Housing Coalition, The Gap (2026 report).

THE EVIDENCE What actually predicts the number

The game matches what researchers find when they compare whole cities to one another.

In a 2022 book, Gregg Colburn and Clayton Page Aldern set out to explain why homelessness is so much worse in some American cities than in others. They tested the usual suspects one by one: rates of mental illness and drug use, poverty, the weather, how generous a city's public assistance is, even whether low-income people were moving in. None of them explained the difference.

What did explain it was the housing market: how high the rents were, and how few empty homes were left. Expensive cities where a place to rent was hard to find had higher rates of homelessness. Cheaper cities where one was easier to find did not, whatever their rates of addiction or illness.

Colburn and Aldern also found that homelessness tends to be lower where poverty is higher. The poorest places are often the cheapest, and a poor person in a cheap place usually still has a roof over their head. It's the expensive cities, not the troubled ones, that manufacture homelessness.

What sets HOW MANY

The price of rent
The gap between what low-wage work pays and what the cheapest rental costs.
How few vacancies
With so few rentals open, anyone who has to move may not find one.
The supply of low-cost homes
How many chairs there are at a price the lowest-income households can afford.

What sets WHO

A job that ended
A layoff, cut hours, an injury that stops the work.
An eviction or rent hike
One letter from the landlord asking for money that wasn't there.
Illness, addiction, a crisis at home
A diagnosis, a relapse, fleeing violence, aging alone.

Everything in the WHO column is real, and that's where compassion and treatment do their work. None of it changes the number of chairs.

HERE The same game, in Asheville

Asheville fits the national pattern.

824
people counted as homeless in Buncombe County on one night in February 2026, up from 755 a year earlier.
74%
of the 334 counted without shelter last had a home in North Carolina; about 60% last had one right here in Buncombe County.
$35.29
the hourly wage a full-time worker needs to afford a modest two-bedroom in the Asheville metro, about 1.9 times what the average renter here earns.

Most of the people counted without shelter did not come here already homeless. They're our own neighbors who lost a place to live in this county. The chairs are scarce here, just as they are across North Carolina, where there are 38 affordable, available homes for every 100 of the lowest-income renter households. The work that keeps this town running, in kitchens, at front desks and in care homes, doesn't pay enough for a modest apartment.

Some of the people counted are struggling with addiction or mental illness. In the 2026 count, 91 adults reported a mental health condition and 62 reported a substance use disorder. Those numbers are self-reported, cover a single winter night, and are almost certainly too low. They describe people who deserve every bit of care and treatment we can fund.

And those struggles are still not the reason the count is 824 rather than, say, 200. Treat every illness and addiction perfectly, keep the same number of chairs, and the same number of people are left standing. Only the faces change.

The point

Count the chairs, not the players.

What any one person on the street is going through is their own story. It asks for compassion, and for treatment where treatment helps. But the size of the crowd is not a story about people's troubles. It is arithmetic: more households than homes they can afford, and someone is left standing every time the music stops.

The arithmetic is the hopeful part, if you let it be. The number of chairs is a choice, and it's ours to make. Add chairs, and the count comes down. As of April 2024, the greater Houston area had cut its count by 63 percent since 2012. It did that by moving people who were already homeless into its relatively affordable apartments and helping pay the rent. The people you see did not set the number here. We did, by how little we built. We can set a different one.

Sources & notes

Point-in-time figures: Asheville-Buncombe Continuum of Care 2026 count (conducted Feb. 10, 2026), reported via WLOS, 828newsNOW, and the Asheville Citizen Times. The where-last-housed shares come from the count's supplemental questions, whose answers cover only the 334 people counted without shelter: 200 (60 percent) said Asheville or Buncombe County, 103 (31 percent) said somewhere else (47 another North Carolina county, 42 another state, 14 no answer), and 31 (9 percent) did not respond. The 74 percent is the 247 who named Buncombe or another North Carolina county (Asheville-Buncombe Continuum of Care, 2026 Point-in-Time Count Results). Housing-shortage figure (38 affordable and available homes per 100 extremely-low-income renter households in North Carolina): National Low Income Housing Coalition, The Gap (2026 report). Housing wage ($35.29/hour for a modest two-bedroom in the Asheville metro; $27.11/hour for North Carolina statewide): NLIHC, Out of Reach (2026). The Asheville figure is about 1.9 times the metro's average renter wage, third-highest of North Carolina's 28 metro areas and the highest among the state's population centers (Raleigh-Cary 1.43, Charlotte 1.11, Durham 1.04). The metro's one-bedroom housing wage is $32.19 an hour (same source). Wages in the work the text names, from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics for the Asheville metro, May 2025: mean hourly wages of $17.00 in food preparation and serving and $19.95 in healthcare support, and a median of $16.96 for hotel, motel and resort desk clerks. City-to-city comparison and the poverty finding: Gregg Colburn and Clayton Page Aldern, Homelessness Is a Housing Problem (University of California Press, 2022). Musical-chairs framework: Kay Young McChesney, "Family Homelessness: A Systemic Problem," Journal of Social Issues 46, no. 4 (1990); the same image was used that year in an editorial by Elliott D. Sclar, "Homelessness and Housing Policy: A Game of Musical Chairs," American Journal of Public Health 80, no. 9 (1990). Houston figure (homelessness down 63 percent in the greater Houston area since 2012): CBS News, April 14, 2024.

The behavioral-health counts (91 adults reporting a mental health condition; 62 a substance use disorder) are self-reported, and answering any question was voluntary, so they are offered as a floor, not a measure. The point-in-time count is a one-night snapshot and a known undercount. The local survey method was expanded in 2024 and was the same in 2025 and 2026, so it does not explain the rise from 755 to 824. That rise came in transitional housing, up from 157 to 245 people, as the largest transitional program, cut back after Helene, increased its capacity and a new one for families hit by Helene opened; the emergency shelter count fell from 270 to 245 and the unsheltered count rose from 328 to 334.

For more information see: www.stepupavl.org

Step Up AVL · stepupavl.org

Will YOU step up?

Every group in our directory is local, vetted, and doing this work right now. Pick one and back it. →