What Happened to Asheville Housing
The agency that houses thousands of the city's lowest-income families is cutting roughly half its staff. It got here through a storm, a financial fall, and three leaders in a single year. Here is the before and after, and what it means for the people inside.
The Housing Authority of the City of Asheville is not a charity and not a landlord in the usual sense. It is the public backstop. It runs the apartments and the rent vouchers that stand between a few thousand of the city's poorest households and the street. When it shrinks, the safety net shrinks with it.
In the spring and summer of 2026, the authority announced two rounds of cuts. The first removed about a fifth of its staff. The second laid out a plan to take the workforce down to fewer than fifty full-time positions, less than half of what it had been. Both followed a financial collapse that the agency traces, in part, to Hurricane Helene.
The cuts are the headline. The story is how a public safety net spent down its cushion and then had to cut into bone.
Before the cuts mean anything, it helps to see the size of what they cut into.
The authority owns and manages roughly fifteen hundred apartments across the city, and it administers thousands of rent vouchers on top of that. Those are the kind that help a family afford a privately owned unit. All told it touches the housing of close to three thousand low-income households, most of them earning far below the area's median. Nearly all of its old public housing has been converted to a voucher-backed model in recent years, a federal program meant to bring private money in for repairs.
That is the thing being reorganized. Not an office. The roof over a few thousand of the lowest-income people in Asheville.
Read each line as a before and after. Each line is sourced and dated in the notes; this is the shape of the change, not a single snapshot.
The full-time-staff figure is the level going into the 2026 cuts. The two baselines the agency has used for its own headcount do not fully line up, so treat the exact trajectory as approximate; the direction is not in doubt.
Helene hit on September 27, 2024. The damage was bad. What it set off inside the authority was worse for the institution.
By the authority's own account to federal regulators, its properties lost water, power, internet, and phone service. Electricity did not come back for most residents and staff until October 6, more than a week later. Staff were hit alongside the residents, some living through flooded roads and no power of their own. The agency held off all evictions through February 2025 and asked Washington for a stack of regulatory waivers to get through the recovery.
Then came the fight that would cost the chief executive her job. According to a lawsuit she later filed, then-CEO Monique Pierre clashed with a board member, who was himself a resident of an authority property, over whether to forgive residents' rent after the storm. Pierre alleges she told him federal law did not let her waive rent on her own. Weeks later, on November 7, 2024, the board fired her in a closed session, citing a memo she had sent staff. The mayor said at the time she was given no reason for the firing.
What followed was a year of churn at the top. An interim director ran the agency for roughly twelve months. The city council then eliminated two board seats, removing the chair and the vice chair. A reconstituted board hired Ella Santos as chief operating officer in mid-2025 and promoted her to president and CEO that November. By the time the cuts were announced, the person delivering them was the third leader the authority had had in a year.
Pierre's account is an allegation in a lawsuit, and the case is unresolved.
She is suing the authority for wrongful termination, framing it as a breach of her contract. The authority says it does not comment on pending litigation, and the board's stated reason for the firing was the staff memo, not the rent dispute. We lay out her claims because they are part of the public record of how the agency reached this point, not because a court has ruled on them. It has not.
A housing authority is judged by its reserves. HUD treats one with less than three months of cushion as being in shortfall, with the risk of federal receivership behind it.
Asheville's authority spent its cushion down. Over two years it drew down about 76 percent of its reserves, and its own financial reports through early 2025 showed expenses running millions ahead of revenue. The chief operating officer told a local station the agency had lost roughly nine million dollars across two years. It would need an extra 1.8 million a year, for five years, just to get back to where it stood in 2023. The board's auditors finished the 2023 audit late, in March 2025, which drove the agency's costs even higher.
So the cuts arrived. In April 2026 the authority eliminated 34 positions, about a fifth of its workforce, to save roughly 1.6 million a year. Most of those jobs, 22 of the 34, were the staff of an afterschool and summer program called PODS. It served around 120 children and had no long-term funding. The rest came out of maintenance, resident services, and administration. In June the agency went further, announcing it would shrink to fewer than fifty full-time staff by the end of 2027 and hand work like maintenance, inspections, and human resources to outside contractors.
The CEO framed it as stewardship. "We have a responsibility to be good stewards of public resources," Santos said. "Every dollar we spend should help us provide better housing, serve more families, and strengthen the long-term future of this organization." The agency says the restructuring will save about two percent of its budget a year and rebuild the reserves it burned.
Stewardship is the agency's word for it. From a resident's doorway, the same changes look different.
Fewer staff are now responsible for more empty apartments. Vacancies climbed from about 50 in 2023 to roughly 144 by April 2026. Every empty unit is both a family not housed and rent the authority is not collecting, which deepens the same hole the cuts are meant to fill. The afterschool program that watched around 120 kids is gone. Maintenance and inspections, the work that keeps a unit livable, will now run through contractors rather than people who answer to the authority directly.
And residents themselves face a new rule. Starting in 2026, working-age adults in the authority's housing must put in at least 15 hours a week of work, with exceptions for the elderly, the disabled, and primary caregivers. The rule reaches new residents first and existing ones in early 2027. The authority presents it as part of a push toward resident self-sufficiency. For a household already on the edge, it is one more condition attached to keeping the roof.
None of this means the authority is failing its core job, and it is fair to say so plainly.
By HUD's own scoring it is still rated a high performer. After Helene it did hold off evictions and forgive rent, and the federal government granted most of the regulatory waivers it asked for. Leadership inherited a hole it did not dig alone, and cutting a program with no funding behind it is the kind of hard call a board is supposed to make. A reasonable person can look at the same numbers and call the restructuring responsible.
The worry is not that anyone acted in bad faith. It is arithmetic. A safety net with half the staff, more empty units, and new conditions on residents is a thinner net, at the exact moment the waitlist runs four thousand families deep. That is the trade the city is making, whether or not it meant to.
A backstop you thin is still the backstop.
The reason this belongs on a site about homelessness is simple. The public housing authority is one of the last structures standing between a low-income family and the street, and right now it is being made smaller. Some of that was forced by a storm and a budget that ran dry. Some of it was chosen, in board votes and a restructuring plan, the way these things usually are.
That is also the part worth holding onto. A net that was thinned by decisions can be restored by decisions. Reserves can be rebuilt, positions can be funded, a waitlist four thousand deep can be treated as the emergency it is. The question Asheville is answering, quietly, in budget lines and contracts, is how much backstop it wants to keep paying for. The people in those fifteen hundred apartments do not get to vote on the answer. The rest of us, in a way, do.
Every group in our directory is local, vetted, and doing this work right now. Pick one and back it. →